PARTICIPATORY TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT - INSTITUTIONS AND METHODS

Authors
Citation
D. Goulet, PARTICIPATORY TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT - INSTITUTIONS AND METHODS, Technological forecasting & social change, 45(1), 1994, pp. 47-61
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Business,"Planning & Development
ISSN journal
00401625
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
47 - 61
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-1625(1994)45:1<47:PT-IAM>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The subordination of technology to finalities outside it must be built into technology assessments. In order to do so, developing countries need: technological ''gatekeepers'' to monitor outside developments; ' 'focal points' to receive, screen, and distribute relevant knowledge n eeded for technology assessment; and institutional arrangements to ass ure ongoing information exchange, concerted planning, and collaborativ e implementation among government, producers, and researchers. Three n ationalities vie for supremacy in decisional arenas: technical, politi cal, and ethical. Interaction among the three should be circular, not vertical. Technology assessment's (TA) qualitative dimensions can be m anaged by using evaluative tools such as the ''development flower.''