Wd. Slanger et al., PREDICTING TOTAL WEIGHT OF RETAIL-READY LAMB CUTS FROM BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN AT THE PROCESSING PLANT, Journal of animal science, 72(6), 1994, pp. 1467-1474
Data of sixty finished, crossbred lambs were used to develop predictio
n equations of total weight of retail-ready cuts (SUM). These cuts wer
e the leg, sirloin, loin, rack, shoulder, neck, riblets, shank, and le
an trim (85/15). Measurements were taken on live lambs and on both hot
and cold carcasses. A four-terminal bioelectrical impedance analyzer
(BIA) was used to measure resistance (R(s), ohms) and reactance (X(c),
ohms). Distances between detector terminals (L, centimeters) were rec
orded. Carcass temperatures (T, degrees C) at time of BIA readings wer
e also recorded. The equation predicting SUM from cold carcass measure
ments (n = 53, R(2) = .97) was .093 + .621 x weight -.0219 x R(s) + .0
248 x X(c) + .182 x L -.338 x T. Resistance accounted for variability
in SUM over and above weight and L(P = .0016). The above equation was
used to rank cold carcasses in descending order of predicted SUM. An a
nalogous ranking was obtained from a prediction equation that used wei
ght only (R(2) = .88). These rankings were divided into five categorie
s: top 25%, middle 50%, bottom 25%, top 50%, and bottom 50%. Within-ca
tegory differences in average fat cover, yield grade, and SUM as a per
centage of cold carcass weight of carcasses not placed in the same cat
egory by both prediction equations were quantified with independent t-
tests. These differences were statistically significant for all catego
ries except middle 50%. This shows that BIA located those lambs that c
ould more efficiently contribute to SUM because a higher portion of th
eir weight was lean.