REDUCED GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT WITH CONSERVATION CROPPING .1. FIELD STUDIES IN THE 1ST YEAR OF THE CROPPING PHASE

Citation
Ja. Kirkegaard et al., REDUCED GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT WITH CONSERVATION CROPPING .1. FIELD STUDIES IN THE 1ST YEAR OF THE CROPPING PHASE, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 45(3), 1994, pp. 511-528
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
ISSN journal
00049409
Volume
45
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
511 - 528
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-9409(1994)45:3<511:RGAYOW>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
An experiment was conducted on a red earth at Harden, N.S.W., to inves tigate the effects of tillage and stubble management on the growth and yield of wheat in the first year of conservation cropping. Treatments involved stubble-management systems of incorporation, burning or rete ntion combined with tillage systems of either direct drilling or minim um tillage. The experiment was conducted on an oat stubble of 3.9 t ha -1. Direct drilling and stubble retention both reduced seedling growth by 15%, compared to cultivated and stubble burnt treatments, but had no effect on plant density or tillering. The effects on shoot growth w ere additive and persisted until maturity, leading to grain yields whi ch varied from 2.16 t ha-1 for the stubble-mulched, direct-drilled tre atment to 3.20 t ha-1 for the burned-stubble, minimum-till treatment. Direct drilling reduced the total root length in the profile (0-160 cm ) at anthesis by 40%, but there was no effect of stubble retention. Re duced shoot growth and rooting depth on direct-drilled and stubble-ret ained treatments reduced the recovery of water and mineral N by the cr op and increased the leaching of mineral N below the root zone. Early shoot growth reductions on direct-drilled plots were not related to le vels of soil water, mineral nitrogen (N) or soil temperature. Reduced shoot growth was associated with increased severity of Rhizoctonia in some direct drilled plots, but growth reductions often occurred in the absence of obvious symptoms. High soil strength (>2 MPa) in the top 1 0 cm of soil may have contributed to reduced growth, although the exac t mechanism remains unclear. Reduced growth associated with the presen ce of stubble was not caused by immobilization of N or increased leaf disease, although reduced soil temperatures may have been partly respo nsible.