Ej. Filardo et al., STRUCTURAL GENES, NOT THE LTRS, ARE THE PRIMARY DETERMINANTS OF RETICULOENDOTHELIOSIS VIRUS A-INDUCED RUNTING AND BURSAL ATROPHY, Virology, 202(1), 1994, pp. 116-128
Reticuloendotheliosis virus strain A (REV-A) and chicken syncytial vir
us (CSV), two replication competent avian retroviruses, differ in the
extent to which they induce a runting syndrome that includes anemia, l
ymphoid organ atrophy, and reduced body size. We have isolated an infe
ctious clone of CSV, the less pathogenic of the two viruses, and compa
red it to REV-A. Partial DNA sequence analysis suggests that it differ
s from REV-A by no more than 1 to 2% at the nucleotide level. Analysis
of viral interference indicates that these two viruses use the same c
ell receptor for infection of both fibroblasts and hematopoietic cells
, DNA sequence of the CSV and REV-A long terminal repeats (LTRs) revea
ls that these structures differ principally by two small insertions (5
and 19 bp) present in the U3 region of REV-A. The larger of these may
encode enhancer sequences that have been reported to influence transc
ription rates in vitro. Measurement of steady-state levels of viral RN
A in infected cells, however, as well as circulating virus in infected
chicks indicates that the different pathogenic responses elicited by
these two viruses are not due to large differences in viral transcript
ion or replication. Chimeric viruses were constructed in which the LTR
s from one virus were used to express the structural genes of the seco
nd virus. Infection of 1-day-old chicks by parental virus as well as t
he reciprocal chimeric constructs demonstrated that the ability to ind
uce both runting and bursal atrophy segregated with the structural gen
es of REV-A, Infection of birds with additional chimeric viruses in wh
ich the env genes of REV-A and CSV were exchanged indicated that the p
athogenic response resulting from REV-A infection was due to at least
two regions of the viral genome encoding structural genes. (C) 1994 Ac
ademic Press, Inc.