Current criticism of C. G. Jung's hypothesis of the existence of a col
lective unconscious takes as its starting point the 12 year-old Carl G
ustav's 'Munstererlebnis' and the interpretatations which conservative
Jung scholars have given to this scene, adapting it to their time. Th
e critics see the collective unconscious as the projection of a severe
defensive struggle on Jung's part - and, on the part of analytical ps
ychology - to avoid the integration of emerging traumatic material. In
pre-Christian American Indian myths, the author finds material analog
ous to the 'Munstererlebnis' which counters this criticism by making t
he collective character of the experience plausible while demonstratin
g the psychological and psychotherapeutic relevance of the hypothesize
d existence of a collective unconscious. At the same time, the interpr
etation of the 'Munstererlebnis' as the paradigmatic expression of the
sufferings of western man in a Christian world becomes untenable.