W. Haas et al., SCHISTOSOMA-HAEMATOBIUM CERCARIAL HOST-FINDING AND HOST-RECOGNITION DIFFERS FROM THAT OF SCHISTOSOMA-MANSONI, The Journal of parasitology, 80(3), 1994, pp. 345-353
Schistosoma haematobium cercarial host-finding responses differ from t
hose of Schistosoma mansoni. The attachment response to warm substrata
is more sensitive and intense and is inhibited by unphysiologically w
arm substrata. Attachment is also stimulated by L-arginine as the excl
usive chemical cue of the human skin surface (threshold 3 mu M); howev
er, the response is drastically lower than that of S. mansoni cercaria
e. No chemical host stimulus could be identified for an enduring conta
ct with the host after attachment. After attachment, the cercariae cre
ep in a temperature gradient toward heat source; their response is, ho
wever, more sensitive than that of S. mansoni (threshold 0.03 vs. 0.15
C/mm). Creeping S. haematobium cercariae orientate in chemical gradie
nts in the same way as S. mansoni cercariae toward L-arginine as the e
xclusive chemical signal of the human skin surface. The selective bene
fit of this behavior is not yet understood. The penetration of both sp
ecies is stimulated by free fatty acids from the human skin surface, n
ot by heat. Thus, S. haematobium responds more to thermal host signals
, whereas S. mansoni prefers chemical host signals.