In this Article, Professor Johnston analyzes the Civil Justice Reform
Act of 1990 and its requirement that every United States District Cour
t direct substantial resources toward reducing delay in the courts. He
discusses the Civil Justice Reform Act in the context of a tradition
of reform efforts directed at reducing delay, and considers how it sha
pes our understanding of delay, and ultimately, procedural justice. Pr
ofessor Johnston questions the utility of using the speed of case proc
essing as a gauge of procedural justice, and criticizes the limited mo
del of procedural justice promoted by the Act and other similar effort
s of delay reduction. Professor Johnston concludes that such reform ef
forts are dangerous because of their effect of narrowing our concerns
for and understanding of procedural justice.