CHARGED POLYMERIC BRUSHES - STRUCTURE AND SCALING RELATIONS

Citation
R. Israels et al., CHARGED POLYMERIC BRUSHES - STRUCTURE AND SCALING RELATIONS, Macromolecules, 27(12), 1994, pp. 3249-3261
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Polymer Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00249297
Volume
27
Issue
12
Year of publication
1994
Pages
3249 - 3261
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-9297(1994)27:12<3249:CPB-SA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
We present numerical results from a self-consistent (mean)-field (SCF) model for the structure and scaling behavior of charged brushes and c ompare these with predictions of an analytical SCF model on the same s ystem. The parameters we consider in this study are the chain length N , the average surface area sigma per anchored chain, the average dista nce m between neighboring charges on the chains, and the salt concentr ation phi(s). At high anchoring densities, three different regimes of brush behavior maybe distinguished. In the salt-free case, the behavio r of the brush is dominated either by electrostatic interactions at hi gh charge densities (osmotic brush) or by nonelectrostatic excluded-vo lume interactions at low charge densities (quasi-neutral brush). Upon adding salt in the solution, a third regime can be found (salted brush ). The behavior in this regime, although resulting from electrostatic interactions, is very similar to that in a neutral brush and can effec tively be described using an electrostatic excluded-volume parameter u psilon(el) approximately phi(s)-1 m-2. We find excellent agreement reg arding structure as well as scaling relations between the two theories in these three (high anchoring density) regimes. At extremely low anc horing densities, agreement between the two theories is less good. Thi s is due to the breakdown at low densities of the mean-field approxima tion presently used in the numerical model. In between, at intermediat e anchoring density the analytical theory predicts a very peculiar reg ime, where the thickness H scales as H approximately N3 sigma-1 m-2. T his so-called ''Pincus brush'', named after the author who originally described it, is not recovered with the numerical theory. For the wide range of parameters used, we find the Pincus regime is too small to b e detected. This is probably true for any reasonable set of parameters .