Mp. Carey et Mc. Slack, TRANSVAGINAL SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY FOR VAULT AND MARKED UTEROVAGINALPROLAPSE, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 101(6), 1994, pp. 536-540
Objective To assess the results of the sacrospinous colpopexy procedur
e for the treatment of vault prolapse following hysterectomy and marke
d uterovaginal prolapse. Design A prospective study of all patients un
dergoing sacrospinous colpopexy for vault and marked uterovaginal prol
apse between December 1991 and December 1992. Setting Kent and Canterb
ury Hospital, Canterbury. Subjects Forty women with vault prolapse fol
lowing hysterectomy and 24 with marked uterovaginal prolapse. Interven
tions All patients underwent posterior vaginal repair, enterocele sac
obliteration and sacrospinous colpopexy. In 48 patients an anterior va
ginal repair with suburethral buttressing sutures was also performed.
A long-needle bladder neck suspension operation (Raz procedure) was in
cluded for three women with coexistent stress incontinence. In 13 pati
ents a vaginal hysterectomy was performed and in 11 the uterus was con
served. A postanal sacrorectopexy was performed on one patient with ma
rked rectal prolapse. Results The mean follow up period was five month
s. So far, there have been three failures in the group treated for vau
lt prolapse. One of these underwent a successful repeat sacrospinous c
olpopexy and repair. The main long term complication was cystocele for
mation. One sexually active patient complained of dyspareunia followin
g surgery. Conclusion The sacrospinous colpopexy is effective in the t
reatment of vault prolapse and compares favourably with abdominal vaul
t supporting procedures. It avoids major abdominal surgery and allows
the surgeon to correct coexistent cystocele and rectocele. This proced
ure is also a useful adjuvant when treating marked uterovaginal prolap
se.