ENHANCED SENSITIVITY GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) CHEMILUMINESCENCE ASSAY REVEALS LOWER POSTGLUCOSE NADIR GH CONCENTRATIONS IN MEN THAN WOMEN

Citation
Im. Chapman et al., ENHANCED SENSITIVITY GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) CHEMILUMINESCENCE ASSAY REVEALS LOWER POSTGLUCOSE NADIR GH CONCENTRATIONS IN MEN THAN WOMEN, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 78(6), 1994, pp. 1312-1319
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
0021972X
Volume
78
Issue
6
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1312 - 1319
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(1994)78:6<1312:ESG(CA>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Modifications were made to a commercially available human (h) GH chemi luminescence assay (Nichols Luma Tag hGH assay), which improved its se nsitivity to 0.002 mu g/L. The results of this assay had a high correl ation with those of the Nichols hGH immunoradiometric assay (IRMA; r = 0.91; P < 0.001). The addition of recombinant hGH-binding protein (0. 1-10 nmol/L) to standards and serum samples caused a dose-responsive r eduction in measured GH in both the chemiluminescence assay and the IR MA; at physiological concentrations of hGH-binding protein, a 10-20% r eduction was observed. Fifteen normal young adults (nine men and six w omen) underwent a standard 100-g oral glucose tolerance test, and plas ma GH was measured from 30 min before until 5 h after glucose ingestio n. GH was measurable in all samples with the chemiluminescence assay, but fell below the sensitivity of the IRMA in 59% of the samples. Ther e was no difference between baseline or peak glucose levels in male an d female subjects, but serum GH concentrations (mean +/- SD) measured by the enhanced sensitivity chemiluminescence assay were lower in male than female subjects at both baseline (0.12 +/- 0.08 vs. 2.3 +/- 2.3 mu g/L; P < 0.01) and the postglucose GH nadir (0.029 +/- 0.014 vs. 0. 25 +/- 0.23 mu g/L; P < 0.01). The high correlation between baseline a nd nadir GH (r = 0.82; P < 0.001) and the equivalent fractional declin e in mean GH levels in men and women after glucose administration (67 +/- 17% vs. 84 +/- 8%; P = 0.06) suggest that the lower GH levels in m en after glucose treatment are due to lower baseline values and not to a greater suppressive effect of glucose.