Eg. Lahoz et al., SUPPRESSION OF MYC, BUT NOT E1A, TRANSFORMATION ACTIVITY BY MAX-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS, MAD AND MXI1, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 91(12), 1994, pp. 5503-5507
Mad and Mxi1, two members of the Myc-related basic-region helix-loop-h
elix/leucine-zipper family of proteins, associate directly with Max to
form sequence-specific DNA binding heterodimers that are transactivat
ion-incompetent. Mad-Max complexes have been shown to exert a strong r
epressive effect on Myc-induced transactivation, perhaps through the c
ompetitive occupation of common promoter binding sites also recognized
by active Myc-Max heterodimers. To place these recent biochemical obs
ervations in a biological context, mad and mxi1 expression vectors wer
e tested for their ability to influence Myc transformation activity in
the rat embryo fibroblast cooperation assay. Addition of an equimolar
amount of mad or mxi1 expression vector to mouse c-myc/ras cotransfec
tions resulted in a dramatic reduction in both the number of foci gene
rated and the severity of the malignant phenotype. Myc-specific suppre
ssion by Mad and Mxi1 was demonstrated by their ability to affect c- a
nd N-myc-, but not ela-, induced transformation. In contrast, mad and
mxi1 expression constructs bearing deletions in the basic region exert
ed only mild repressive effects on Myc transformation activity, sugges
ting that occupation of common DNA binding sites by transactivation-in
competent Mad-Max or Mxi1-Max complexes appears to play a more dominan
t role in this suppression than titration of limited intracellular poo
ls of Max away from active Myc-Max complexes. Thus, these biological d
ata support a current model for regulation of Myc function in which re
lative intracellular levels of Mad and Mxi1 in comparison to those of
Myc may determine the degree of activation of Myc-responsive growth pa
thways.