R. Montealegre, EGOCENTRIC LANGUAGE IN CONTEMPORARY PSYCH OLOGY - POLEMICS AND INVESTIGATIONS, Revista latinoamericana de psicología, 26(1), 1994, pp. 111-128
The Vygotsky-Piaget debate concerning egocentry language, continues be
ing a source for investigations. Flavell, Kohlberg, and other authors
propose the term ''private speech'' ; Godinovich and Evans the term ''
sociocentrism'' or ''context influenced''. Some investigators point ou
t that in egocentric communication it is indispensable to take into co
nsideration the behavior of the speaker, of the listener, their interr
elationships, return communication, and situation parameters. In oppos
ition to Piaget, there is research that indicates that in three-year o
ld children, there exist adaptation to expressions in relation to the
needs of the listener, the task, and the situation. Egocentric communi
cation has been studied in play behavior and in children's drawnings.
In the Piagetian conceptualization about egocentric versus decentratio
n, some investigations have been carried out that analyse types of dec
entration in the child. Other researches indicate that children are no
t so egocentric and that they cooperate in appropriate situations that
promote cognitive development and language. In the Vygotsky-Piaget de
bate, private speech has been investigated in relation to age, sex, na
tionality, I. Q, task difficulty, and the regulatory role of the adult
s in the solucion of the child's tasks. Some investigations question V
ygotsky's position concerning the importance of egocentric language in
the regulation and planning of the child's actions. In our research,
following Vygotsky's position, we obtained the formation of ''language
for himself'' as planner and regulator of action.