BRONCHOCONSTRICTION OCCURRING DURING EXERCISE IN ASTHMATIC SUBJECTS

Citation
Kc. Beck et al., BRONCHOCONSTRICTION OCCURRING DURING EXERCISE IN ASTHMATIC SUBJECTS, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 149(2), 1994, pp. 352-357
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
ISSN journal
1073449X
Volume
149
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
352 - 357
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(1994)149:2<352:BODEIA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
To demonstrate physiologic changes associated with asthma symptoms tha t many patients with asthma develop during exercise, we used sustained constant-load and interval exercise protocols with subjects breathing dry room temperature air. In constant-load exercise, subjects pedaled a stationary bicycle at 50% of their maximal power capacity for 36 mi n. In interval protocols, subjects pedaled at 60% of maximal capacity for 6 min and then 40% of maximal for 6 min; the 12-min cycle was repe ated three times for a total exercise time of 36 min. Maximal expirato ry flow versus volume maneuvers (MEFV) were obtained before, at 6-min intervals during, and at 5-min intervals after exercise. Changes in pe ak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), an d forced expiratory flow at 50% of pre-exercise vital capacity (FEF(50 )) were compared with pre-exercise values. Within 15 min after a maxim al 1-min incremental exercise protocol, mean flows decreased compared with pre-exercise (PEF, mean -22%, range -46 to 5%; FEV(1), mean -21%, range -42 to -3%; FEF(50), mean -41%, range -80 to 3%; all p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in MEFV flows until 18 min of const ant-load exercise, when FEV(1) and FEF(50) fell (FEV(1), mean -6%, ran ge -15 to 2%; FEF(50), mean -14%, range -32 to 6%; both p < 0.05), alt hough changes in PEF were minimal and were not significantly different compared with pre-exercise. During the interval protocol, mean flows declined each time work load was reduced from 60 to 40% of maximal cap acity (PEF, -10%, range -26 to 7%; FEV(1), mean -10%, range -22 to -3% ; FEF(50), mean -24%, range -55 to 3%; all p < 0.05), and flows increa sed toward pre-exercise values each time work load was increased again to 60% of maximal capacity. We conclude that in subjects with EIA, br onchoconstriction can occur during exercise, particularly during perio ds of reduced exercise intensity, although the constriction is reversi ble by a return to higher exercise intensity. There is little refracto riness to repeat cycles of periods of high followed by low work rates. Airway function during and after exercise likely reflects a dynamic b alance between bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator influences.