Kc. Beck et al., BRONCHOCONSTRICTION OCCURRING DURING EXERCISE IN ASTHMATIC SUBJECTS, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 149(2), 1994, pp. 352-357
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
To demonstrate physiologic changes associated with asthma symptoms tha
t many patients with asthma develop during exercise, we used sustained
constant-load and interval exercise protocols with subjects breathing
dry room temperature air. In constant-load exercise, subjects pedaled
a stationary bicycle at 50% of their maximal power capacity for 36 mi
n. In interval protocols, subjects pedaled at 60% of maximal capacity
for 6 min and then 40% of maximal for 6 min; the 12-min cycle was repe
ated three times for a total exercise time of 36 min. Maximal expirato
ry flow versus volume maneuvers (MEFV) were obtained before, at 6-min
intervals during, and at 5-min intervals after exercise. Changes in pe
ak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), an
d forced expiratory flow at 50% of pre-exercise vital capacity (FEF(50
)) were compared with pre-exercise values. Within 15 min after a maxim
al 1-min incremental exercise protocol, mean flows decreased compared
with pre-exercise (PEF, mean -22%, range -46 to 5%; FEV(1), mean -21%,
range -42 to -3%; FEF(50), mean -41%, range -80 to 3%; all p < 0.05).
There were no significant changes in MEFV flows until 18 min of const
ant-load exercise, when FEV(1) and FEF(50) fell (FEV(1), mean -6%, ran
ge -15 to 2%; FEF(50), mean -14%, range -32 to 6%; both p < 0.05), alt
hough changes in PEF were minimal and were not significantly different
compared with pre-exercise. During the interval protocol, mean flows
declined each time work load was reduced from 60 to 40% of maximal cap
acity (PEF, -10%, range -26 to 7%; FEV(1), mean -10%, range -22 to -3%
; FEF(50), mean -24%, range -55 to 3%; all p < 0.05), and flows increa
sed toward pre-exercise values each time work load was increased again
to 60% of maximal capacity. We conclude that in subjects with EIA, br
onchoconstriction can occur during exercise, particularly during perio
ds of reduced exercise intensity, although the constriction is reversi
ble by a return to higher exercise intensity. There is little refracto
riness to repeat cycles of periods of high followed by low work rates.
Airway function during and after exercise likely reflects a dynamic b
alance between bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator influences.