Ee. Thomas et al., THE UTILITY OF LATEX AGGLUTINATION ASSAYS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PEDIATRIC VIRAL GASTROENTERITIS, American journal of clinical pathology, 101(6), 1994, pp. 742-746
To design a rapid and efficient protocol for processing pediatric stoo
l specimens, the authors used 434 specimens to evaluate two commercial
latex assays to detect rotavirus (Meritec-Rotavirus(TM) and Rotalex(T
M)) and one to detect adenovirus (Adenolex(TM)). Rotavirus latex assay
results were compared with electron microscopic examination and adeno
virus latex assay results with virus culture. Ninety-two specimens (21
%) were positive for rotavirus and 28 (6.5%) for adenovirus; 5 (1%) ha
d both viruses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive valu
es, and negative predictive values for the three assays were, respecti
vely, as follows: Meritec-Rotavirus (97%, 99%, 97%, 99%), Rotalex (91%
, 99%, 94%, 98%), and Adenolex (46%, 99%, 77%, 97%). For primary rotav
irus screening, the Meritec-Rotavirus and Rotalex latex assays offer a
good alternative to electron microscopic examination. For primary ade
novirus screening, the low sensitivity of the Adenolex latex assay pre
cludes its use as a routine screen. Its excellent specificity, however
, makes it a useful tool for culture confirmation.