Despite increasing costs of stroke management in patients aged over 75
years, the advantages of stroke rehabilitation units over geriatric w
ards remain equivocal. A prospective controlled study was undertaken i
n 144 stroke survivors over 75 years. These patients were stratified i
nto 3 groups according to prognosis 2 weeks after stroke. Patients wer
e randomly allocated to a stroke rehabilitation unit (n = 71) or to mi
xed (acute and rehabilitation) geriatric wards (n = 73) and managed ac
cording to existing practices in either setting. Both groups were comp
arable in baseline characteristics. Patients on geriatric wards receiv
ed more physiotherapy on average(18.4 +/- 9.6 vs 15.2 +/- 6.7 h, p<0.0
5) but similar occupational therapy (10.4 +/- 3.1 vs. 10.7 +/- 2.4 h)
compared with stroke rehabilitation unit patients. Then was no differe
nce in the proportion of time spent on different rehabilitation activi
ties. Patients managed on geriatric wards showed higher mortality (p <
0.05), especially in those with poor prognosis. The median length of
stay (84 vs. 36 days, p < 0.001) was also longer in patients managed o
n geriatric wards, especially in patients with intermediate or poor pr
ognosis. Median discharge Barthel scores (14 vs. 13) and the percentag
e of patients going home (65 vs. 59%) were comparable in both settings
. Functional outcome of stroke rehabilitation was comparable between t
he stroke unit and mixed geriatric wards. Stroke rehabilitation units
have the advantage of reducing late mortality due to systemic complica
tions and the length of hospital stay in elderly stroke survivors.