Cb. Nowers et al., EFFECT OF MELATONIN IMPLANTS, FLUSHING AND TEASING ON THE REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE OF SPRING-MATED DOHNE MERINO EWES, South African journal of animal science, 24(1), 1994, pp. 22-26
The effect of melatonin implants, flushing and teaser rams on the repr
oductive performance of spring-mated Dohne Merino ewes was investigate
d. The ewes (n = 534) were randomly allotted to four treatments, namel
y (1) no treatment (control), (2) melatonim implants (melatonin), (3)
flushing and teaser rams (flushing and teasers), and (4) melatonin imp
lants, flushing and teaser rams (combined treatment). Ewes in groups 2
and 4 were implanted with melatonin 32 days before commencement of th
e mating season (16 November 1990). In groups 3 and 4, ewes were suppl
emented with 400 g of chocolate maize/head/day from three weeks before
to the end of the mating period and vasectomized rams were introduced
10 days prior to mating. Conception rate, lambing percentage and fecu
ndity were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the melatonin treatment
group (group 2) (93.5%, 105.4% and 1.13, respectively) than in control
ewes (86.6%, 91.0% and 1.05, respectively). A higher (P < 0.05) lambi
ng percentage was recorded in group 3 than in the control group (99.3%
vs. 91.0%). When compared with the control treatment (5 December, SE
+/- 4.5 days), the mean dates of the first recorded oestrus ('first oe
strus') during mating were 21 November (SE +/- 1.6 days). 28 November,
(SE +/- 3.98 days) and 30 November (SE +/- 5.14 days) for groups 2 (P
< 0.01), 3 (P < 0.05) and 4 (P < 0.05), respectively. When compared w
ith the control treatment (33 days), the spread of first oestrus was 1
8, 28 and 27 days for groups 2 (P < 0.01), 3 (P < 0.05), and 4 (P < 0.
05), respectively. However, no synergistic effect on reproduction and
date of first oestrus above group 2 was found when melatonin-implanted
ewes received the supplementation and stimulation with teasers (group
4). In animals treated with melatonin only (group 2) the onset of oes
trus was earlier and the reproduction performance was higher than in o
ther treatments (P < 0.05). At current prices melatonin treatment is m
ore cost-effective than flushing and teasing.