Kidder, Bellettirie, and Cohn's [(1977) ''Secret Ambitions and Public
Performances: The Effects of Anonymity on Reward Allocations Made by M
en and Women,'' Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 13, pp
. 70-80] self-presentational account of gender differences in distribu
tive justice was examined. Men and women attending two, primarily whit
e, northeastern universities distributed a jointly earned reward betwe
en themselves and a hypothetical co-worker who was either a stranger o
r a friend and whose inferior task performance resulted from either lo
w ability or low effort. Subjects made ther allocations under both pub
lic and private conditions. Men allocated more equitably (i.e., accord
ing to co-worker input) in public than women did, whereas women alloca
ted more equitably in private than men did, only when working with str
angers who exerted low effort. In addition, among female subjects, pri
vate allocations to low-effort strangers were more equitable than publ
ic allocations. Among male subjects, however, public allocations to lo
w-effort strangers were more equitable than private allocations. The c
onditions under which men make equitable allocations and women make eq
ual allocations, and possible reasons for these differences, are discu
ssed.