This article explores a monopolist's incentive to distort the directio
n of technological change. For strategic reasons, the monopolist might
invent and employ a socially undesirable technology. In so doing, he
might jeopardize not only the vigor of product-market competition but
also the development of socially desirable methods of production. As a
result, technological dynamism cannot be considered a social virtue u
ntil its direction is compared with the social optimum.