BICYCLE HELMET USE AMONG SCHOOLCHILDREN

Authors
Citation
Ll. Rourke, BICYCLE HELMET USE AMONG SCHOOLCHILDREN, Canadian family physician, 40, 1994, pp. 1116-1124
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
0008350X
Volume
40
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1116 - 1124
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-350X(1994)40:<1116:BHUAS>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of a community bicycle helmet education and subsidy program and the further effect of a bicycle rodeo on helm et ownership and use among elementary schoolchildren. The unanticipate d effect of a child cyclist fatality was also measured. DESIGN Helmet ownership and use were measured in two ways: a questionnaire was sent to all elementary schoolteachers asking about helmet ownership and use by their students; and volunteers counted the children riding their b icycles to school. SETTING Elementary schools in the town of Goderich, population 7400, and the town of Kincardine, population 6227, both on Lake Huron in southwestern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS More than 80% of the 1050 elementary school students in Goderich and, for comparison, more than 90% of the 1439 elementary school students in Kincardine. INTERV ENTIONS An extensive education campaign with programs, assemblies, tea ching aids, speakers, and a colouring and poster contest, coupled with a discount helmet offer in October 1998. Incentives to helmet use, su ch as bicycle rodeos, took place in May 1992 and 1993. A child cyclist not wearing a helmet was fatally injured in September 1992. MAIN OUTC OME MEASURES Teachers polled students on helmet use and student volunt eers counted children riding bicycles and noted helmet use. RESULTS A total of 250 helmets were purchased, and helmet use was observed to in crease among 5- to 14-year-old children from 0.75% to 12.8% during 9 m onths. Program effect was significantly greater on younger children, a nd girls used helmets more often than boys did. The cycling fatality i n Goderich was associated with a dramatic increase in helmet use (to m ore than 50%), a significantly higher rate than in Kincardine. A secon d subsidy and rodeo did not further increase helmet use. CONCLUSIONS A small community with limited resources can mount a bicycle helmet edu cation and incentive program with high exposure and participation rate s by children. Despite an initial 17-fold increase in observed helmet use, more than 87% of cyclists still did not wear helmets. The cycling fatality was associated with a significant increase in helmet use.