The inductive argument from the falsity of most past scientific theori
es (more than 100 years old) to the falsity of most present ones is de
fensible, I argue, if it is modified to account for the degrees of the
oreticity or observationality in such theories, and the extent to whic
h they are hedged. The case of descriptive astronomy is examined to sh
ow that most of the true theories of the 1890s were high in observatio
nality and/or significantly hedged. The false theories of that period,
however, were not even approximately true. Apparently, scientists are
more interested in supplanting theories with improved observations th
an in producing true theories.