Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) act as antiarrhythmic drugs, with a p
harmacology similar to quinidine and other class I antiarrhythmics. Th
is characteristic has until recently been considered an advantage in p
atients with both depression and arrhythmia. However, developments in
cardiology make this situation appear more complicated. Class I antiar
rhythmic drugs given to patients with ventricular arrhythmias followin
g myocardial infarction increase rather than decrease mortality. The m
echanism behind this increased mortality is not a function of the arrh
ythmia, but rather of ischaemic heart disease. Because of the similari
ty of TCAs to class I antiarrhythmic agents, TCAs may carry a similar
risk. Recognition of this fact complicates the treatment of depression
in patients with ischaemic heart disease. The selective serotonin (5-
hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) have fewer effects
on the cardiovascular system than TCAs. Therefore, these agents would
appear to be a safer alternative to TCAs in patients with cardiovascu
lar disease. However, their relative efficacy compared with the TCAs i
s poorly established in the elderly, a patient group that often presen
ts with cardiovascular disease. If a patient with ischaemic heart dise
ase presents with mild to moderate depressive symptoms and a pharmacol
ogical treatment for depression is indicated, we would begin with an S
SRI. A TCA would only be considered if the patient failed to respond t
o an adequate trial of the SSRI. In patients with severe, melancholic
depression, but mild to moderate ischaemic heart disease, we prefer tr
eatment with a TCA. In patients with severe, melancholic depression an
d severe ischaemic disease, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe
alternative to drug treatment.