C. Snehalatha et al., DIFFERENCES IN PLASMA-INSULIN RESPONSES IN URBAN AND RURAL INDIANS - A STUDY IN SOUTHERN INDIANS, Diabetic medicine, 11(5), 1994, pp. 445-448
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
Fasting and 2 h post glucose plasma immunoreactive insulin (fasting IR
I and 2 h IRI) responses were measured in urban (n = 149) and rural (n
= 40) individuals with normal glucose tolerance during an epidemiolog
ical survey. In this survey, 900 urban and 1038 rural subjects were sc
reened for glucose intolerance by capillary blood sampling. The respec
tive response rates were 91 % and 88 %. We had planned to collect veno
us blood for IRI estimation, i.e. from 180 urban and 200 rural subject
s. The compliance for the same was poor from the rural subjects and th
erefore the number available for IRI estimation was small. The mean +/
- SD ages of the urban and rural groups were similar (35.3 +/- 9.9 and
38.6 +/- 13.1 years, respectively). The rural population had lower bo
dy mass index (BMI) and subscapular:triceps ratio compared to the urba
n group (p < 0.001). The total calorie consumption was lower and physi
cal activity was higher in rural population. Fasting and 2 h insulin v
alues in urban population were 16.6 +/- 9.4 mU l-1 and 60.6 +/- 42.5 m
U l-1 and in rural 6.7 +/- 5.1 mU l-1 and 32.4 +/- 27.8 mU l-1, respec
tively; the values being significantly lower in the rural population (
p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that in urban populati
on the fasting insulin was correlated to the BMI and the 2h IRI to 2 h
glucose, BMI and the subscapular:triceps ratio. In the rural populati
on, similar results were obtained, except in that the 2 h IRI was infl
uenced by the gender also. This study showed that the fasting IRI and
2 h IRI responses in normoglycaemic urban and rural populations differ
ed widely, probably related to the differences in body mass and adipos
ity distribution. The higher IRI concentrations in normoglycaemic urba
n subjects suggest a relative insulin resistance and this may be a con
tributory factor for the higher prevalence of diabetes in urban Indian
s.