La. Rust et al., INTRATHECAL NARCOTICS FOR OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA IN A COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 170(6), 1994, pp. 1643-1648
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to establish whether intrathecal narcotic
s for obstetric analgesia offer an adequate and cost-effective alterna
tive to epidural analgesia with minimal side effects in our small, sem
irural community hospital with limited anesthesia coverage. STUDY DESI
GN: Low-risk patients at greater than or equal to 35 gestational weeks
in active labor were offered intrathecal narcotics. A retroactive cha
rt review of every patient receiving an intrathecal injection was comp
ared with a chart review of the next consecutive low-risk patient who
did not receive an intrathecal narcotic. Age, parity, and status of la
bor at the time of application were noted, as was the subsequent rate
of labor and the type of delivery. Side effects such as changes in vit
al signs, headache, vomiting, pruritis, urinary retention, and/or resp
iratory depression were noted. All study patients received fentanyl, 2
5 to 35 mu g, plus 0.25 to 0.3 mg of preservative-free morphine combin
ed with 6 to 8 mg of lidocaine. Within 15 minutes of delivery intraven
ous nalbuphine (Nubain), 5 mg, and oral naltrexone, 12.5 mg, were admi
nistered. Pain relief was recorded as excellent, satisfactory, or unsa
tisfactory (requiring additional medication). RESULTS: During the 30-m
onth review period, 90 patients (3% of total deliveries) received intr
athecal narcotics. There were three sets of twins, for a total of 93 l
ive births. Ten patients (11%) required primary cesarean section, and
of the 83 vaginal births 35 (38%) were spontaneous, two (2%) required
forceps deliveries, and 46 (49%) were delivered by vacuum extraction,
which was significantly higher than the 28 (31%) for controls. The rat
e of labor was not affected, with both groups requiring a similar rate
of oxytocin (Pitocin) augmentation. Significantly more patients recei
ving intrathecal narcotics experienced pruritus and urinary retention
compared with controls. There was no incidence of respiratory depressi
on. Eighty-four (93%) of the 90 patients reported excellent pain relie
f, five patients had satisfactory relief lasting 2.5 to 6 hours, and o
ne was unsatisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: In our hospital with limited anest
hesia services intrathecal narcotics offer excellent labor pain relief
with manageable side effects and without adverse obstetric outcome.