Seventeen brain-damaged subjects with dominant hemisphere pathology an
d 24 matched control subjects were asked to perform simple familiar ge
stures under four conditions: (1) verbal command (pantomime), (2) imit
ation, (3) with the actual object, and (4) verbal command a second tim
e. The subjects subsequently watched a video of an actor performing si
mple movements and decided whether or not these were performed accurat
ely. The gestural production task was videoed and analyzed for error t
ype. Error type remained consistent over the four task conditions, alt
hough subgroups of patients made different types of errors. One group
of patients with Ideomotor Apraxia (IMA) made more errors but of the s
ame type as the controls, i.e., movement-related errors and the use of
''body part as object'' (BPO). The second group made mainly substitut
ed (i.e. unrelated) movements and perseverative errors. The second gro
up of subjects was also poorer at discriminating incorrectly performed
movements in the recognition task. BPO errors were commonly made by t
he control group and they were also chosen as correct in the recogniti
on task. This indicated that use of BPO may reflect a convention in sy
mbolising gestures rather than pathology. The performance of the IMA s
ubjects was discussed in relation to current theories of the mechanism
s underlying apraxia. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.