F. Gambarelli et al., VISCERAL LEISHMANIASIS AT THE AIDS TIME - THE DIFFICULTIES OF THE BIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS, Medecine et maladies infectieuses, 24, 1994, pp. 572-575
Numerous techniques are used in visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis, but
none is completely satisfactory when used on its own. Direct diagnosis
is highly reliable because false positive results are unlikely. Unfor
tunately, direct examination of bone marrow samples is not sensitive e
nough to avoid false negative results and direct examination of spleen
aspiration, which is more sensitive, is rarely performed because of t
he risk of haemorragia. Sample culture may improve the sensitivity of
direct examination but it is time-consuming and sometimes leads to a f
alse negative result. In order to improve the direct diagnosis, some a
uthors have developed PCR assay for leishmaniasis by using amplificati
on of a ribosomal RNA sequence, a kinetoplast sequence or a repetitive
genomic sequence. This latest is the only one which is highly specifi
c for visceral leishmaniasis agents. The reliability of the PCR based
diagnosis is still being evaluated but first results are very encourag
ing. Serology exhibits excellent sensitivity and specificity for the d
iagnosis of new cases of visceral leishmaniasis in immunocompetent hos
ts but we observed some negative serological results using several dif
ferent immunological detection methods in immunocompromised patients.
This lack of serological reactivity persisted throughout the course of
their infections. Immunological detection methods are also difficult
to use for the diagnosis of relapses in patients with previous history
of visceral leishmaniasis. Indeed, patients often preserve a positive
serology that would interfere with unambigous detection of relapse.