Kk. Assil et al., A COMBINED INCISION TECHNIQUE OF RADIAL KERATOTOMY - A COMPARISON TO CENTRIPETAL AND CENTRIFUGAL INCISION TECHNIQUES IN HUMAN DONOR EYES, Ophthalmology, 101(4), 1994, pp. 746-754
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the extent of corneal flattening and
the anatomy of the incision grooves produced by centrifugal, centripet
al, and combined incisions in a human donor eye model. Methods: Twenty
-seven eyes, divided into three groups of nine, received eight-incisio
n radial keratotomy using the centrifugal, centripetal, or combined in
cision technique. Corneal curvature was evaluated using a topography s
ystem, and the anatomy of the incision was assessed by light microscop
y and scanning electron microscopy. Results: The average central corne
al flattening at the 3-mm clear zone was 4.16 +/- 1.47 diopters (D) fo
r centrifugal incisions; 7.71 +/- 2.77 D for centripetal incisions; an
d 9.26 +/- 1.75 D for combined incisions. The difference in corneal fl
attening between eyes that received centrifugal versus either centripe
tal or combined incisions was significant (P < 0.01), whereas the diff
erence between combined and centripetal incisions was not significant
(P = 0.174). Anatomic differences were observed within the incision gr
ooves produced by the three techniques. Conclusion: The authors descri
be a novel combined incision technique of radial keratotomy that provi
des the potential safety of a centrifugal incision with the effect of
a centripetal incision.