A COMBINED INCISION TECHNIQUE OF RADIAL KERATOTOMY - A COMPARISON TO CENTRIPETAL AND CENTRIFUGAL INCISION TECHNIQUES IN HUMAN DONOR EYES

Citation
Kk. Assil et al., A COMBINED INCISION TECHNIQUE OF RADIAL KERATOTOMY - A COMPARISON TO CENTRIPETAL AND CENTRIFUGAL INCISION TECHNIQUES IN HUMAN DONOR EYES, Ophthalmology, 101(4), 1994, pp. 746-754
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01616420
Volume
101
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
746 - 754
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(1994)101:4<746:ACITOR>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the extent of corneal flattening and the anatomy of the incision grooves produced by centrifugal, centripet al, and combined incisions in a human donor eye model. Methods: Twenty -seven eyes, divided into three groups of nine, received eight-incisio n radial keratotomy using the centrifugal, centripetal, or combined in cision technique. Corneal curvature was evaluated using a topography s ystem, and the anatomy of the incision was assessed by light microscop y and scanning electron microscopy. Results: The average central corne al flattening at the 3-mm clear zone was 4.16 +/- 1.47 diopters (D) fo r centrifugal incisions; 7.71 +/- 2.77 D for centripetal incisions; an d 9.26 +/- 1.75 D for combined incisions. The difference in corneal fl attening between eyes that received centrifugal versus either centripe tal or combined incisions was significant (P < 0.01), whereas the diff erence between combined and centripetal incisions was not significant (P = 0.174). Anatomic differences were observed within the incision gr ooves produced by the three techniques. Conclusion: The authors descri be a novel combined incision technique of radial keratotomy that provi des the potential safety of a centrifugal incision with the effect of a centripetal incision.