DELETION ANALYSIS OF THE M4 MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTOR - MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS FOR ACTIVATION OF BUT NOT COUPLING TO THE G(I) GUANINE-NUCLEOTIDE-BINDING REGULATORY PROTEIN REGULATE RECEPTOR INTERNALIZATION
Cj. Vankoppen et al., DELETION ANALYSIS OF THE M4 MUSCARINIC ACETYLCHOLINE-RECEPTOR - MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS FOR ACTIVATION OF BUT NOT COUPLING TO THE G(I) GUANINE-NUCLEOTIDE-BINDING REGULATORY PROTEIN REGULATE RECEPTOR INTERNALIZATION, European journal of biochemistry, 222(2), 1994, pp. 525-531
In order to investigate whether coupling to and/or activation of guani
ne-nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) is involved in agonist-ind
uced internalization of m4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs)
, a deletion mutant [des-(264-394)mAChR] was constructed that lacks a
substantial portion of the putative third intracellular loop. The wild
-type receptor and des-(264-394)mAChR stably expressed in Chinese hams
ter ovary cells in essentially comparable amounts, exhibited identical
antagonist-binding affinities. Consistent with the reported importanc
e of the third cytoplasmic loop for G(i) protein activation, the des-(
264-394)mAChR showed a drastically reduced potential to mediate agonis
t-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. In contrast, the ability of
the mutant receptor to couple to G(i) proteins was not impaired, as de
monstrated by a similar guanine-nucleotide-sensitive and pertussis-tox
in-sensitive high-affinity agonist-receptor binding for both mAChRs. I
n contrast, des-(264-394)mAChR was hardly able to stimulate the GTPase
activity of G proteins, suggesting impaired activation of G(i) protei
ns rather than ineffective coupling to G(i) proteins. Internalization
of wild-type receptor and des-(264-394)mAChR was observed with similar
agonist concentrations and showed similar maximal values. However, de
s-(264-394)mAChR displayed a significantly reduced rate of receptor in
ternalization. A similar attenuation of wild-type mAChR internalizatio
n was obtained upon pertussis toxin treatment. In conclusion, our data
provide evidence that the molecular determinants of the m4 mAChR invo
lved in G(i)-protein coupling and activation are not identical and tha
t activation of, but not coupling to, G(i) proteins regulates m4 mAChR
internalization.