R. Haque et al., DETECTION OF ENTAMOEBA-HISTOLYTICA AND E-DISPAR DIRECTLY IN STOOL, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 50(5), 1994, pp. 595-596
Citations number
2
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Tropical Medicine
Current diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica infection requires the dire
ct microscopic identification of the parasite, a technique that is ins
ensitive and cannot distinguish pathogenic E. histolytica from noninva
sive E. dispar. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) antigen defe
ction tests were developed to distinguish E. histolytica from E. dispa
r infection in stool specimens. The ELISA result for E. histolytica an
tigen was positive in 26 of 27 E. histolytica-positive stool specimens
, three of 25 E. dispar-positive stools, and one of 30 stools with oth
er or no intestinal parasites, giving a specificity and sensitivity fo
r the detection of E. histolytica infection of 93% and 96%, respective
ly. The assay result used to detect both E. dispar and E. histolytica
was positive in 26 of 27 E. histolytica-positive stools, 19 of 25 E. d
ispar-positive stools, and one of 30 stools negative dy microscopy and
culture for Entamoeba, giving a specificity and sensitivity of 97% an
d 87%, respectively. Because these ELISAs can be completed in several
hours, they offer promise as rapid and sensitive means of detecting am
ebic infection.