D. Tilman et al., HABITAT DESTRUCTION, DISPERSAL, AND DETERMINISTIC EXTINCTION IN COMPETITIVE COMMUNITIES, The American naturalist, 149(3), 1997, pp. 407-435
An analytical model of competitive coexistence in spatial habitats, mo
dified to address habitat destruction, predicts that the most abundant
species can be among the first species driven extinct by habitat dest
ruction, given that abundant species are the poorest dispersers and be
st competitors. This contrasts with the classical view of biased extin
ction of rare species. Here we explore the robustness of this predicti
on both analytically and in spatially explicit simulations of more rea
listic cases. The prediction proved surprisingly robust. The poorest d
ispersers, which in this model generally are the best competitors and
may be the most abundant species, were among the first driven extinct
by habitat destruction whether they were abundant or rare, had short o
r long range dispersal, or reproduced continuously or periodically; wh
ether competitive displacement was immediate or gradual; whether habit
at destruction was clumped, uniform, or random and whether destruction
occurred at once or progressively; and whether the habitat was large
or small. The amount of destruction sufficient to produce extinctions
changed considerably as model assumptions changed, but the biased exti
nction remained. The underlying reason for the robustness of our concl
usions is the broad assumption that inferior competitors persist by vi
rtue of greater dispersal ability and/or lower mortality rates. Furthe
r work on the forces allowing multispecies coexistence is thus essenti
al for understanding the effects of habitat destruction on extinction.