E. Laurikainen et al., A CRITICAL-LOOK AT THE TREATMENT OF MAXILLARY SINUSITIS WITH LONG-TERM DRAINING TUBES, Acta oto-laryngologica, 114(3), 1994, pp. 341-347
Long-term draining tubes (LTD) have become a common treatment in compl
icated and prolonged forms of maxillary sinus empyema. Since not all p
atients show good recovery with this treatment we used sinus-manometry
, mathematical calculations, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to
critically analyze 6 cases with a prolonged history of the disease. F
ive out of the 6 patients recovered quickly after removal of the LTDs,
normally performed sinus punctures, and an appropriate antibacterial
treatment. One patient underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Two of the 6 patients had uncommon bacterial cultures (Pseudomonas mir
abilis, Klebsiella oxytoga) in their sinus secreta. Two of the removed
LTDs were examined with SEM. The porous polyethylene was shown to hav
e absorbed bacterial plague which, besides narrowing the lumen, can ca
use recurrent infections. In 5 other patients, the draining pressure (
DP) was 0.9 +/- 0.16(M +/- SD) kg/cm(2), as measured during irrigation
with a No. 2 Lichtwitz needle (1.8 mm, i.d). Mathematical calculation
using the Hagen-Boisseouille equation indicated that with our LTDs (0
.7 mm, i.d.) the DP needs to be 40 times greater than the DP when usin
g an ordinary Lichtwitz needle to get equal flushing capacity. We reco
mmend i) LTD treatment of maxillary sinus empyema be closely followed
up ii) that, in prolonged cases, the LTDs should be removed and the si
nuses repeatedly irrigated with an ordinary needle or antrostomy, and
iii) that a more suitable tubing material and insertion system (to all
ow a larger radius of the tube) be developed.