ACUTE EFFECTS OF RAT GROWTH-HORMONE (GH), HUMAN GH AND PROLACTIN ON PROLIFERATING RAT-LIVER CELLS IN-VITRO - A STUDY OF MITOTIC BEHAVIOR AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
G. Vergani et al., ACUTE EFFECTS OF RAT GROWTH-HORMONE (GH), HUMAN GH AND PROLACTIN ON PROLIFERATING RAT-LIVER CELLS IN-VITRO - A STUDY OF MITOTIC BEHAVIOR AND ULTRASTRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS, Tissue & cell, 26(3), 1994, pp. 457-465
Examination of livers from transgenic mice over expressing human growt
h hormone (hGH) revealed numerous alterations including a striking inc
idence of mitotic figures. The reason for increased proliferation is u
nclear, but could be related to effects of hGH, which is also acting a
s a lactogen in rodents. In order to identify some of the actions of G
H, we have examined the effects of rat and human GH and rat prolactin
on proliferation, as well as on morphological differentiation of norma
l rat liver cells in vitro. These cells, isolated from a 20-day-old ra
t, proliferate in culture, incorporate BrdU and are thus strikingly di
fferent from primary cultures of isolated hepatocytes, which typically
are non-proliferating cells.;Monolayers of these cells were treated w
ith rat prolactin (rPRL), rat growth hormone (rGH), rPRL and rGH in co
mbination, or hGH, for 24 hr. Subsequently, mitotic figures were count
ed and the cultures were processed for transmission electron microscop
y. The incidence of mitotic figures was significantly increased by rPR
L (27.4%) versus control (19%), while rGH (13%) and hGH (9.6%) signifi
cantly decreased proliferation. In controls. 2% of the proliferating c
ells were in prophase, approximately 12% in metaphase and approximatel
y 15% in telophase. In contrast, rPRL caused a significant increase in
the number of cells in prophase (14%) and reduced the number of cells
in the other mitotic stages. hGH and rGH reduced the overall number o
f mitotic figures. Unexpectedly, the effects of rGH plus rPRL were dif
ferent from the effect of hGH. In addition, each treatment caused dist
inct morphological changes of liver cell organelles. Thus, after rPRL
treatment mitochondria were generally large and bent, while rGH treatm
ent was associated with irregularly shaped mitochondria and conspicuou
s microtubule/microfilament arrangements. In contrast, after rPRL plus
rGH treatment the chromatin pattern was altered. In summary, these re
sults suggest specific hormone effects on both cell proliferation and
metabolism as reflected by distinct changes in morphology. Unexpectedl
y, the combined effect of rCH and rPRL were not identical to the effec
ts of hGH, suggesting a possibility of a unique effect of hGH in this
system.