PURPOSE: To evaluate interactive computer-based informed consent for u
se of contrast material versus the same information in a written forma
t. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 160) referred for radiologic e
xamination with intravenous contrast material were block randomized (s
ex, age, and previous exposure to contrast material) into two groups a
nd were provided either written or computer-based (video) informed con
sent. RESULTS: The female patients in the video group scored better on
the test than those in the group with the written consent form. Male
patients attained equivalent scores with both types of consent. The vi
deo took an average of 1.6 minutes longer to complete, probably becaus
e the majority of patients chose to be informed of every risk of intra
venous contrast material. CONCLUSION: This project demonstrates that a
video format for informed consent before use of intravenous contrast
material offers a good alternative to the written consent form.