STARTING AN ACADEMIC CAREER - A SURVEY OF JUNIOR ACADEMIC PULMONARY PHYSICIANS

Citation
Vc. Broaddus et Dw. Feigal, STARTING AN ACADEMIC CAREER - A SURVEY OF JUNIOR ACADEMIC PULMONARY PHYSICIANS, Chest, 105(6), 1994, pp. 1858-1863
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
Journal title
ChestACNP
ISSN journal
00123692
Volume
105
Issue
6
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1858 - 1863
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(1994)105:6<1858:SAAC-A>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Objective: To learn about the status of junior faculty in the specialt y of pulmonary diseases and about their attitudes concerning their fut ure in academic medicine. Design: Mailed survey. Participants: A total of 209 junior pulmonary faculty were reported by the directors of the 106 US pulmonary training institutions with at least 3 fellow trainin g positions; 157 (75 percent) responded to our questionnaire. Results: Most respondents described themselves as happy and productive, and al most all planned to stay in academic medicine. However, some problems were evident that could interfere with their plans to remain: a lack o f protected time for research (only 15 percent of assistant professors and instructors spent 75 percent or more of their time in research), a lack of understanding about the rules and procedures of promotion (o nly 31 percent said they understood), failure of communication with th e Chiefs of the Division and of Medicine (less than half had had a mee ting about promotion with the Chief of the Division, 16 percent with t he Chairman of Medicine), and a concern about their financial security (73 percent were concerned). Although women, who represented only 13 percent of the respondents, reported similar work hours and publicatio n rates, they were less optimistic about promotion than the men (40 pe rcent of women considered their chance for promotion good to excellent vs 64 percent of men). The junior faculty reported that the greatest obstacles to their academic success were insufficient protected time f or their research, maintaining research productivity, and inadequate a nd uncertain funding. Conclusions: The success of junior faculty is im portant to the success of academic medicine. More attention should be paid to ensuring protected continuous time for research, educating abo ut promotion, and improving funding opportunities.