1. Surgery and radiotherapy to axillary lymph nodes during breast canc
er treatment is often followed, commonly years later, by chronic postm
astectomy oedema (PMO). PMO is considered a 'high protein' oedema due
to reduced axillary lymph drainage. Since oedema formation also depend
s on fluid input (capillary filtration), we studied the Starling press
ures in the affected and contralateral arm. Colloid osmotic pressure w
as measured in patient serum (pi(p)) and interstitial fluid (pi(i)). S
ubcutis fluid was collected from PMO arms by both wick and aspiration
methods, and from the control arm by the wick method only. Interstitia
l hydraulic pressure (P-i) was measured by the wick-in-needle method.
2. Oedema pi(i) was 19.2 +/- 4.1. cmH(2)O (n=13, wick) to 16.3 +/- 4.4
cmH(2)O (n = 41, aspirate; difference not significant; means +/- S.D.
throughout). This was significantly lower than pi(i) in the control a
rm (21.4 +/- 3.8 cmH(2)O, n = 14, P < 0.01, analysis of variance). Als
o, there was a negative correlation between oedema pi(i) and the perce
ntage increase in arm volume (correlation coefficient r = -0.35, P < 0
.05) in contrast to conventional expectation. 3. Oedema P-i (1.9 +/- 2
.0 cmH(2)O, n = 28) exceeded the subatmospheric control P-i (-2.8 +/-
3.0 cmH(2)O; P < 0.01). Venous and arterial pressures were normal but
pi(p) was subnormal (31.1 +/- 2.7 cmH(2)O, n = 47). 4. Net pressure op
posing capillary blood pressure, P-o, was calculated as P-i + sigma (p
i(p) - pi(i)) for a reflection coefficient, sigma, of 0.90-0.99. P-o i
n the control arm, 6.2-8.5 cmH(2)O, was less than antecubital venous p
ressure, 10.5 cmH(2)O. This provides no support for the traditional vi
ew that venous capillaries in the arm are in a state of continuous flu
id reabsorption. 5. In the PMO arm, P-o was raised to 15.0 +/- 4.6 cmH
(2)O (n = 28, P < 0.01, ANOVA) and correlated positively with increase
in arm volume (r = 0.41, P < 0.05). A rise in P-o will reduce filtrat
ion rate if capillary pressure is unaltered, which should raise inters
titial protein concentration and pi(i) - whereas pi(i) actually decrea
sed. Possible explanations include a rise in capillary pressure. The p
athophysiology of postmastectomy oedema evidently involves additional
mechanisms besides lymphatic damage.