GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE ACCURACY OF SELF-REPORTED WEIGHT

Citation
Ne. Betz et al., GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE ACCURACY OF SELF-REPORTED WEIGHT, Sex roles, 30(7-8), 1994, pp. 543-552
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Social","Women s Studies
Journal title
ISSN journal
03600025
Volume
30
Issue
7-8
Year of publication
1994
Pages
543 - 552
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-0025(1994)30:7-8<543:GDITAO>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
To investigate gender as a possible moderator of the validity of self- reported weight data in studies of body image and eating disorders, th e discrepancies between reported weights and actual weights were exami ned in a sample of 186 college students, 90 males and 96 females. Nine ty-four percent of the students were Anglo-American, and 6% were Afric an-American, Asian-American, or Hispanic. In comparison to male studen ts, female students underreported their weight to a significantly grea ter degree. Generally, use of self-reported weight, rather than actual weight, would result in more subjects classified as normal weight or underweight and fewer classified as overweight, using standard methods of classifying individuals into weight categories. And consistent wit h previous research, normal-weight females perceived themselves as ove rweight while normal-weight males were -more likely to perceive themse lves as underweight. Implications for further research on gender diffe rences in eating problems and body image are discussed.