Wm. Mackenzie et al., ADENOSINE INHIBITS THE ADHESION OF ANTI-CD3-ACTIVATED KILLER LYMPHOCYTES TO ADENOCARCINOMA CELLS THROUGH AN A(3) RECEPTOR, Cancer research, 54(13), 1994, pp. 3521-3526
We have investigated the hypothesis that adenosine, a purine nucleosid
e produced within hypoxic regions of solid tumors, may interfere with
the recognition of tumor cells by cytolytic effector cells of the immu
ne system. We measured the adhesion of murine spleen-derived anti-CD3-
activated killer (AK) lymphocytes to syngeneic MCA-38 colon adenocarci
noma cells in a model system. Adenosine, in the presence of the adenos
ine deaminase inhibitor coformycin to prevent the breakdown of adenosi
ne, inhibited adhesion by up to 60%. The inhibitory effect of adenosin
e was exerted on the AK cells and not on the MCA-38 targets. The respo
nse to adenosine was generated at the cell surface, since the inhibiti
on of adhesion was not abrogated by S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine or
dipyridamole, which block adenosine uptake. The inhibition of adhesio
n due to adenosine was not blocked by either the A(1) receptor antagon
ist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine or the A(2) receptor antagonist
3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine. This suggested that non-A(1), A(2)
receptor might be involved. The relative order of potencies of adenosi
ne and common analogues was: 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine = adenosin
e = (R)-phenylisopropyladenosine > N-6-cyclopentyladenosine > 2-chloro
-N-6-cyclopentyladenosine = 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-et
hyl- carboxamidoadenosine. This agonist potency profile was again inco
nsistent with either the A(1) or the A(2) receptor subtype but indicat
ed that the recently described A(3) receptor subtype might be responsi
ble for the inhibition of adhesion. Consistent with this suggestion, a
minophenylethyladenosine, an adenosine analogue that binds with high a
ffinity to A(3) receptors, inhibited the adhesion of AK cells to MCA-3
8 tumor eels with high potency (50% inhibitory concentration approxima
te to 1 nM). Adenosine, therefore, interferes with the AK cell recogni
tion of colorectal tumor targets by acting through an A(3) receptor on
the effector cells. We suggest that this mechanism of immunosuppressi
on, secondary to tissue hypoxia, may be important in the resistance of
colorectal and other solid cancers to immunotherapy.