CHANGES OF BEHAVIOR AND MONOAMINE METABOLITES IN THE RAT-BRAIN AFTER REPEATED METHAMPHETAMINE ADMINISTRATION - EFFECTS OF DURATION OF REPEATED ADMINISTRATION
H. Suzuki et al., CHANGES OF BEHAVIOR AND MONOAMINE METABOLITES IN THE RAT-BRAIN AFTER REPEATED METHAMPHETAMINE ADMINISTRATION - EFFECTS OF DURATION OF REPEATED ADMINISTRATION, Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 21(2), 1997, pp. 359-369
1. The authors studied the mechanism of the reverse-tolerance phenomen
on caused by long-term administration of central stimulant drugs. Meth
amphetamine(MAP) was chronically administered to rats, and the reverse
-tolerance phenomenon was studied in terms of behavioral changes and c
hanges in monoamine metabolites, the latter being examined by in vivo
microdialysis of the extracellular compartment of the corpus striatum.
The authors also studied [H-3]SCH23390 and [H-3]spiperone binding to
striatal membranes after chronic MAP administration. 2. MAP(4 mg/kg) o
r saline was administered intraperitoneally once daily to male rats. I
n Groups 1 and 2, 10 and 30 injections of MAP were given, respectively
. In Groups 3 and 4, animals received 10 and 30 injections of saline a
s controls. One week after the final injection, all rats were challeng
ed with 4 mg/kg MAP. 3. Groups 1 and 2 displayed more intense stereoty
py than Groups 3 and 4, indicating that behavioral sensitization had b
een achieved in the former. Dopamine(DA) levels increased rapidly in r
esponse to MAP challenge in all groups, with the increases in Groups 1
and 2 being more marked than that in Groups 3 and 4. Group 1 showed g
reater persistence and a higher rate of DA increase than Group 2. 4. T
he number of D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors did not change after the r
epeated MAP administration. 5. The rate of increase in DA release indu
ced by MAP was dependent on the duration of repeated administration, a
nd there was no correlation between the intensity of stereotypy and th
e rate of increase in DA release induced by MAP. These findings sugges
t that enhancement in DA release is unlikely to be the sole cause of b
ehavioral sensitization.