Pc. Gordon et al., IS 40-PERCENT TO 70-PERCENT DIAMETER HARROWING AT THE SITE OF PREVIOUS STENTING OR DIRECTIONAL CORONARY ATHERECTOMY CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT, The American journal of cardiology, 74(1), 1994, pp. 26-32
Traditional binary definitions of coronary restenosis based on 6-month
continuous angiographic measurements (e.g., >50% diameter stenosis) m
ay give confusing results for lesions whose late percent stenosis fall
s near the arbitrary threshold. To determine the long-term clinical co
nsequences of such lesions, the overall correlation between follow-up
percent stenosis and the performance of subsequent ischemia-driven tar
get vessel revascularization (triggered by significant angina or a pos
itive exercise study result, or both) was examined in 443 consecutive
lesions treated with directional coronary atherectomy or Palmaz-Schatz
coronary stenting Followup angiograms (available in 355 lesions, 82%)
were stratified into 3 groups: severe late stenosis (>70% stenosis, n
= 59), moderate late stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis, n = 72), and mini
mal late stenosis (<40% stenosis, n = 224). With an average clinical f
ollow-up of 933+/-394 days, 92% of lesions in the ''severe late stenos
is'' group were treated with ischemia-driven target vessel revasculari
zation, compared with 0% of the lesions in the ''minimal late stenosis
'' group. ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization was performe
d in 38% of patients In the ''moderate late stenosis'' group. However,
patients In this group who did not undergo revascularization (despite
the fact that 43% of them had a late stenosis of >50%) showed a simil
arly favorable longterm clinical outcome to patients with a minimal la
te stenosis. These results support a strategy of conservative manageme
nt for the 20% of patients who have a moderate (40% to 70%) late steno
sis after stenting or atherectomy, M do not have evidence of ischemia.