Ja. Hill et al., IODIXANOL, A NEW ISOSMOTIC NONIONIC CONTRAST AGENT COMPARED WITH IOHEXOL IN CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY, The American journal of cardiology, 74(1), 1994, pp. 57-63
Iodixanol, a new ratio 6 nonionic iodinated contrast agent with an osm
olality equal to a serum, was compared with iohexol in a randomized, d
ouble-blind, parallel study. Two hundred patients undergoing elective
diagnostic cardiac angiography were randomized to iodixanol (n = 101)
or iohexol (n = 99). There were no differences noted between the 2 age
nts in the mean changes in systolic or diastolic blood pressure or hea
rt rate during or immediately after any angiography. However, signific
antly more patients had a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of >20
mm Hg during left coronary angiography with iodixanol. The only signif
icant differences in any electrophysiologic parameter were slightly mo
re PR prolongation during left coronary angiography with iodixanol and
more ST-segment depression with iohexol during coronary angiography.
Neither was clinically significant. Injection-associated discomfort oc
curred with both agents, but more patients experienced moderate to sev
ere discomfort with iohexol (52%) than with iodixanol (17%) (p <0.001)
. Only 1 potentially serious adverse event, ventricular fibrillation w
ith iohexol, was considered related to contrast, and there were no dif
ferences noted between agents. Overall, angiographic quality was equal
with all angiograms being assessed as good or excellent in both group
s (p = 0.885). In this low-risk population undergoing cardiac angiogra
phy, iodixanol is safe and effective without clinically important diff
erences from iohexol. Additional studies in patients at high risk for
complications should help further define the role of iodixanol in card
iac angiography.