C. Demey et al., DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF THE NOVEL NO-DONATING DRUG PIRSIDOMINE AND ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE ON THE VENOUS VASCULAR BED, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 46(4), 1994, pp. 295-299
Sixteen healthy male subjects were investigated on four occasions when
they received either placebo, 10 mg isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), or 2
.5 or 10 mg pirsidomine, a novel NO-donating drug. A constant-rate iv.
infusion of a subsystemic dose (average 42 ng.min(-1), SD 20.5) of no
radrenaline in a dorsal hand vein was begun 1 h before drug treatment.
It did not cause systemic changes but reduced the venous hand vein di
ameter by about 50 %. This venoconstrictor response was approximately
halved by 10 mg ISDN. Pirsidomine, in contrast, did not affect the in
situ venoconstrictor responses to noradrenaline. ISDN and pirsidomine
reduced systemic resting blood pressure. ISDN and 10 mg pirsidomine we
re approximately equipotent in reducing systolic blood pressure, both
in terms of the duration and the extent of the effect (maximum average
reduction of ISDN -6.7, 95 % CI -10.3 to -3.0; and 10 mg pirsidomine
-7.6, 95 % CI -11.3 to -4.0 mmHg, respectively); 2.5 mg pirsidomine wa
s less effective (-4.1, 95 % CI -7.8 to -0.5). ISDN and 10 mg pirsidom
ine were also similarly effective in reducing diastolic blood pressure
(ISDN -8.4 mmHg, 95 % CI -10.5 to -6.2; 10 mg pirsidomine -6.0 mmHg,
95% CI -8.2 to -3.9; 2.5 mg pirsidomine -2.8 mmHg, 95 % CI -5.0 to -0.
6) but the effects of ISDN were longer lasting. Although similar with
regard to their putative mechanism(s) of action and likely arterial/ar
teriolar effects, pirsidomine and ISDN seem to affect the venous vascu
lar bed in distinctly different ways.