COMPARISON OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF MONOMERIC, DIMERIC, AND TRIMERIC PROCYANIDINS ON THE BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF SKIN TUMOR PROMOTION INMOUSE EPIDERMIS IN-VIVO
Hu. Gali et al., COMPARISON OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF MONOMERIC, DIMERIC, AND TRIMERIC PROCYANIDINS ON THE BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF SKIN TUMOR PROMOTION INMOUSE EPIDERMIS IN-VIVO, Planta medica, 60(3), 1994, pp. 235-239
Several procyanidin dimers and an epicatechin trimer purified from Dou
glas hr bark tannins were compared with their monomer components (+)-c
atechin and (-)-epicatechin for their abilities to inhibit the biochem
ical effects of the potent tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13
-acetate (TPA) in mouse epidermis in vivo. Topical applications of the
procyanidins, 15 min before the tumor promoter, inhibit TPA-induced o
rnithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and this inhibition increases wi
th the degree of polymerization (trimer > dimer > monomer). At a dose
of 10 mu mol, all procyanidin dimers inhibit the ODC response to TPA t
o a greater degree than 20 mu mol of epicatechin and 10 mu mol of epic
atechin and/or catechin. Under similar conditions, catechin and epicat
echin fail to inhibit the hydroperoxide (HPx) response to TPA whereas
the procyanidin dimers inhibit this response by almost 40 %. At a dose
of 10 mu mol, the epicatechin trimer also inhibits TPA-induced ODC ac
tivity and HPx production to a greater degree than 10-30 mu mol of epi
catechin. However, these various treatments with monomeric, dimeric, a
nd trimeric procyanidins do not differ significantly in their abilitie
s to inhibit TPA-stimulated DNA synthesis. These results suggest that
some of the antitumor-promoting effects of procyanidins might increase
at the biflavanoid and triflavanoid levels.