COMPARISON OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF MONOMERIC, DIMERIC, AND TRIMERIC PROCYANIDINS ON THE BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF SKIN TUMOR PROMOTION INMOUSE EPIDERMIS IN-VIVO

Citation
Hu. Gali et al., COMPARISON OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF MONOMERIC, DIMERIC, AND TRIMERIC PROCYANIDINS ON THE BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF SKIN TUMOR PROMOTION INMOUSE EPIDERMIS IN-VIVO, Planta medica, 60(3), 1994, pp. 235-239
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
00320943
Volume
60
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
235 - 239
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-0943(1994)60:3<235:COTIEO>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Several procyanidin dimers and an epicatechin trimer purified from Dou glas hr bark tannins were compared with their monomer components (+)-c atechin and (-)-epicatechin for their abilities to inhibit the biochem ical effects of the potent tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13 -acetate (TPA) in mouse epidermis in vivo. Topical applications of the procyanidins, 15 min before the tumor promoter, inhibit TPA-induced o rnithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and this inhibition increases wi th the degree of polymerization (trimer > dimer > monomer). At a dose of 10 mu mol, all procyanidin dimers inhibit the ODC response to TPA t o a greater degree than 20 mu mol of epicatechin and 10 mu mol of epic atechin and/or catechin. Under similar conditions, catechin and epicat echin fail to inhibit the hydroperoxide (HPx) response to TPA whereas the procyanidin dimers inhibit this response by almost 40 %. At a dose of 10 mu mol, the epicatechin trimer also inhibits TPA-induced ODC ac tivity and HPx production to a greater degree than 10-30 mu mol of epi catechin. However, these various treatments with monomeric, dimeric, a nd trimeric procyanidins do not differ significantly in their abilitie s to inhibit TPA-stimulated DNA synthesis. These results suggest that some of the antitumor-promoting effects of procyanidins might increase at the biflavanoid and triflavanoid levels.