QUALITY-OF-LIFE DURING CLINICAL-TRIALS - CONCEPTUAL-MODEL FOR THE LUNG-CANCER SYMPTOM SCALE (LCSS)

Citation
Pj. Hollen et al., QUALITY-OF-LIFE DURING CLINICAL-TRIALS - CONCEPTUAL-MODEL FOR THE LUNG-CANCER SYMPTOM SCALE (LCSS), Supportive care in cancer, 2(4), 1994, pp. 213-222
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,Rehabilitation,"Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
09414355
Volume
2
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
213 - 222
Database
ISI
SICI code
0941-4355(1994)2:4<213:QDC-CF>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
To appreciate the full benefits of treatment for lung cancer, especial ly in trials that fail to show improvements in survival, data recordin g the quality of life must be captured and refined to produce meaningf ul information. A conceptual model for quality of life for lung cancer patients was tested to obtain information about the dimensions of the quality-of-life construct for ongoing development and testing of a su bjective measure for clinical trials. Using a longitudinal study desig n, the stability of predictive factors of the physical and functional dimensions of quality of life were examined using regression analysis. A patient-rated quality-of-life measure, the Lung Cancer Symptom Scal e (LCSS), was administered to 144 non-small-cell lung-cancer patients at baseline, day 29, and day 71 of a chemotherapy trial. The range bf explained variance for all three components of the lung cancer model o ver three assessment points was as follows: symptomatic distress 41%-5 3%, activity status 48%-52%, and overall quality of life 35%-53%. The three dimensions fluctuated slightly during intervention. but were rel atively stable factors across all three times of evaluation. The LCSS model explained nearly half of the variance for quality of life experi enced by lung cancer patients during therapy with a new chemotherapeut ic agent. These findings provide support that the physical and functio nal dimensions are important predictors of quality of life for individ uals with lung cancer. Meaningful subjective quality-of-life data can be obtained to evaluate an intervention by using a disease- and site-s pecific quality-of-life measure for individuals with lung cancer, base d on a reproducible conceptual model such as the LCSS, which is suitab le for serial measurement for the progressive disease of lung cancer.