President Clinton's leadership has been criticized as being too indeci
sive, overly flexible, and lacking in a firm commitment to valued goal
s. Although such characteristics imply an excessively high level of co
gnitive complexity, the scoring of Clinton's utterances during the 199
2 campaign and during the first eight months of his administration rev
eals that his integrative complexity is generally very low compared to
a group of other recent presidents of the U. S. Unlike most, he showe
d no increase in complexity after his election. This pattern, reflecti
ng faulty cognitive management of resources applied to problem solving
, is similar to those of unsuccessful presidents (Nixon, Carter, Hardi
ng, and Hoover) and failed (as opposed to successful) revolutionary le
aders. The possible sources, meanings, and implications of this findin
g are discussed.