E. Spiess et al., CATHEPSIN-B ACTIVITY IN HUMAN LUNG-TUMOR CELL-LINES - ULTRASTRUCTURAL-LOCALIZATION, PH SENSITIVITY, AND INHIBITOR STATUS AT THE CELLULAR-LEVEL, The Journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry, 42(7), 1994, pp. 917-929
We investigated the appearance and activity of the cysteine proteinase
cathepsin B and its physiological inhibitors, stefins A and B, at the
cellular level in human tumor cell lines HS-24, derived from a primar
y lung tumor (squamous cell), and SB-3, derived from a metastasis (lun
g adenocarcinoma). In addition to cathepsin B, these tumor cells also
expressed the immunologically and functionally related cathepsin L, bu
t not cathepsin H. Stefin A was found in HS-24 but not in SB-3 cells;
stefin B was found in both cell types. Using a specific fluorogenic cy
tochemical assay, the intracellular activity of the enzyme was localiz
ed and quantified. Thus, the cellular cathepsin B kinetics for the syn
thetic substrates Z-Arg-Arg-4M beta NA and Z-Val-Lys-Lys-Arg-4M beta N
A, its pH dependence and inhibition by E64, stefins A and B, and cysta
tin C could be determined. From these measurements it appeared that th
e enzyme exhibited different cleavage rates for these substrates in th
e different cell types, showed considerable cleavage activity at neutr
al pH, which was stable under these conditions for extended time perio
ds, and was highly sensitive to the inhibitors E64 and cystatin C but
was considerably less sensitive to stefins, particularly stefin A. By
conventional light microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and
electron microscopy the enzymatic activity was localized in lysosomes
, as expected, but also in the endoplasmic reticulum, nuclear membrane
, and plasma membrane. The endoplasmic reticulum is a site at which on
ly pre-mature enzyme forms exist, which are usually not active. The ap
pearance of enzymatic activity at the plasma membrane confirms earlier
biochemical and immunofluorescence microscopic investigations. The di
fferent sites of localization within the cells make it likely that dif
ferent forms of the enzyme are expressed simultaneously, which follow
alternate ways of processing and sorting. Taken together, the results
support an involvement of the enzyme under extracellular conditions in
degradative processes.