QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PERIPHERAL AND CORONARY-ARTERY LESIONS BEFORE AND AFTER BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY - A COMPARISON OF INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ANGIOGRAPHY
M. Schartl et al., QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PERIPHERAL AND CORONARY-ARTERY LESIONS BEFORE AND AFTER BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY - A COMPARISON OF INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ANGIOGRAPHY, Heart and vessels, 9(4), 1994, pp. 202-209
Intravascular ultrasound and conventional angiography were used to det
ermine the degree of stenosis before and after angioplasty in 25 conse
cutive patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and 15 sele
cted patients with coronary artery disease. Angiographic determination
s of the luminal area and percent stenosis were made with the help of
an automatic detection system, and the same parameters were evaluated
planimetrically in the ultrasound studies. Following angioplasty of pe
ripheral lesions, angiography demonstrated a significantly greater inc
rease in mean luminal area (10.8 +/- 7.8 mm2 vs 5.8 +/- 4.0 mm2; P < 0
.05) and a greater reduction in degree of stenosis (26% +/- 16% vs 14%
+/- 11%; P < 0.05) than did the ultrasonic investigation. There was a
significant but moderate correlation between values for the luminal a
rea determined by angiography and ultrasound before angioplasty (r = 0
.75; SEE = 4.8 mm2) and in normal proximal segments of coronary arteri
es (r = 0.79; SEE 4.1 MM2) . Following angioplasty there was no signif
icant correlation between angiographic findings and those determined b
y intravascular ultrasound in peripheral or coronary lesions. These re
sults suggest that angiography and intravascular ultrasound are fundam
entally different imaging and analysis techniques. Following angioplas
ty, conventional angiography rarely demonstrated dissection or intralu
minal filling defects, while intravascular ultrasound detected plaque
rupture and the presence of intraluminal atheroma in almost all cases.
Quantitative determinations of luminal area and degree of stenosis re
ly on indirect measures with conventional angiography, while these par
ameters are determined directly by intravascular ultrasound. Additiona
l studies and clinical experience should demonstrate whether intravasc
ular ultrasound will play a significant role in the planning and manag
ement of vascular interventions.