W. Friesdorf et al., DATA QUALITY OF BEDSIDE MONITORING IN AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 11(2), 1994, pp. 123-128
Computerized record keeping promises complete, accurate and legible do
cumentation. Reliable measurements are a prerequisite to fulfill these
expectations. We analyzed the physiological variables provided by bed
side monitoring devices in 657 bedside visits performed by an experien
ced Intensive Care nurse during 75 Intensive Care rounds. We registere
d which variables were displayed. If a variable was displayed, we asse
ssed whether it could be used for documentation or should be rejected.
If a value was rejected the reason was registered as: the measurement
was not intended (superfluous display), the current clinical situatio
n did not allow proper measurement, or other reasons. Basic variables
(vital signs and respiration related variables) were displayed in more
then 90%, specific variables (e.g. intracranial pressure) were displa
yed in less than 50% of the situations. Displayed variables were super
fluous on an average of 11% because measurement was not intended. Vari
ables like heart rate, temperature, airway pressure, minute volume of
ventilation, arrhythmia, pulmonary arterial pressure, non-invasive blo
od pressure, and intracranial pressure provide high quality measured v
alues (acceptance of more than 90%). Invasive arterial pressure, centr
al venous pressure, respiration rate and oxygen saturation (via pulse
oximetry) provided lower quality values with a rejection rate higher t
han 10%. Inappropriate sensor technology to match the clinical environ
ment seems to be the root cause. In future the request for automatic d
ocumentation will increase. In order to avoid additional staff workloa
d and to ensure reliable documentation, sensor technology especially r
elated to respiration rate, blood pressure measurements, and pulse oxi
metry should be improved.