A recent exchange with Shaffer (this issue) reveals several points of
agreement underscoring the utility of our subject-based approach to un
derstanding moral thought. Shaffer's latest reply raises the interesti
ng question of whether thinking about morality, the focus of our study
, constitutes moral thinking. Our response underscores how Shaffer's a
pproach to studying moral thought differs from our own. More important
, we emphasize how disagreements over what constitutes moral thinking
can and should be settled empirically.