O. Hoeghguldberg et Rb. Emlet, ENERGY USE DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LECITHOTROPHIC AND A PLANKTOTROPHIC ECHINOID, The Biological bulletin, 192(1), 1997, pp. 27-40
The energy required for development was measured in two closely relate
d echinoids with differing modes of development. Heliocidaris tubercul
ata hatches from a 95-mu m egg (similar to 0.1 mu g dry organic mass)
and develops via a planktotrophic larva over 21-30 days into a juvenil
e (5.3-7.5 mu g). H. erythrogramma hatches from a similar to 400 mu m
egg (11.6-19.0 mu g) and develops over 3.5-4 days via a lecithotrophic
larva into juvenile with a mass not detectably different from that of
the egg. Oxygen consumption increased exponentially in H. tuberculata
and peaked at about 200-500 pmol indiv(-1) h(-1), whereas the oxygen
consumption of H. erythrogramma increased rapidly, reaching a plateau
at about 800 pmol indiv(-1) h(-1) on the second day. Metabolic energy
expenditure for development to metamorphosis was twofold higher for H.
tuberculata (52-60 mJ indiv(-1)) than for H. erythrogramma (26-35 mJ
indiv(-1)). The interspecific comparison suggests that about half the
metabolic expenditure for planktotrophic development goes toward build
ing and operating the larval feeding apparatus and that the return on
this investment is 400%-600% over the larval period. When the energy e
quivalents of the organic masses of the juveniles are included, the en
ergy for constructing a juvenile on a per mass basis is essentially th
e same for both species (cf. H. tuberculata: 37-42 mJ mu g(-1); H. ery
throgramma: 34-36 mJ mu g(-1)) and implies the absence of developmenta
lly based energetic barriers or benefits to changes in modes of develo
pment. Substantial amounts of metabolically inactive material may be p
resent in embryos with nonfeeding development and should be considered
physiological measurements and comparisons.