Theophylline has shown itself to be a useful bronchodilator in the tre
atment of asthma, although its use has been restricted of late due to
its lesser potency and greater side effects when compared with beta-ad
renergic inhalants. The objective of our study is to evaluate its clin
ical effectiveness in moderately severe asthma. We study 12 patients w
ith stable chronic asthma on whom a spirometry in basal conditions was
performed and after therapeutic levels of theophyllinemia were reache
d. Peak flow and clinical symptomatology were monitored during one-wee
k periods in both phases of the study. Daytime and night-time symptoms
were evaluated independently. No significant changes were observed in
the spirometric values. No changes were observed in the brochodilatio
n test, the concomitant consumption of brochodilators, or in the maxim
um expiratory fluids. However, significant differences were observed i
n the overall computation of symptoms and in the quantification of noc
turnal symptoms. We conclude that retarded theophylline presents littl
e usefulness in the treatment of asthma, even though its use can be re
commended as symptomatic treatment of nocturnal asthma given its prolo
nged bronchodilating effect.