Ar. Palmer, FROM SYMMETRY TO ASYMMETRY - PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS OF ASYMMETRY VARIATION IN ANIMALS AND THEIR EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 93(25), 1996, pp. 14279-14286
Phylogenetic analyses of asymmetry variation offer a powerful tool for
exploring the interplay between ontogeny and evolution because (i) co
nspicuous asymmetries exist in many higher metazoans with widely varyi
ng modes of development, (ii) patterns of bilateral variation within s
pecies may identify genetically and environmentally triggered asymmetr
ies, and (iii) asymmetries arising at different times during developme
nt may be more sensitive to internal cytoplasmic inhomogeneities compa
red to external environmental stimuli, Using four broadly comparable a
symmetry states (symmetry, antisymmetry, dextral, and sinistral), and
two stages at which asymmetry appears developmentally (larval and post
larval), I evaluated relations between ontogenetic and phylogenetic pa
tterns of asymmetry variation, Among 140 inferred phylogenetic transit
ions between asymmetry states, recorded from 11 classes in five phyla,
directional asymmetry (dextral or sinistral) evolved directly from sy
mmetrical ancestors proportionally more frequently among Larval asymme
tries, In contrast, antisymmetry, either as an end state or as a trans
itional stage preceding directional asymmetry, was confined primarily
to postlarval asymmetries, The ontogenetic origin of asymmetry thus si
gnificantly influences its subsequent evolution, Furthermore, because
antisymmetry typically signals an environmentally triggered asymmetry,
the phylogenetic transition from antisymmetry to directional. asymmet
ry suggests that many cases of laterally fixed asymmetries evolved via
genetic assimilation.